Is this some kind of virus, or do you not actually exist? This Message was undeliverable due to the following reason: Your message was not delivered because the return address was refused. The return address was '<pgranzeau at cox.net>' Please reply to Postmaster at cox.net if you feel this message to be in error. Reporting-MTA: dns; lakemtao02.cox.net Arrival-Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:06:19 -0500 Received-From-MTA: dns; cx2076818-a.cox.net (68.0.24.46) Final-Recipient: RFC822; <davids at kithrup.com> Action: failed Status: 5.1.1 Remote-MTA: dns; garth.kithrup.com (204.152.188.42) Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 5.7.1 Rejected: 68.1.17.243 is too spammish Received: from cx2076818-a.cox.net ([68.0.24.46]) by lakemtao02.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.08 201-253-122-130-108-20031117) with ESMTP id <20040303180618.ZLR11398.lakemtao02.cox.net at cx2076818-a.cox.net> for <davids at kithrup.com>; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:06:18 -0500 Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20040303125913.02d31d80 at pop.east.cox.net> X-Sender: pgranzeau at pop.east.cox.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 13:00:24 -0500 To: David Silberstein <davids at kithrup.com> From: "Peter H. Granzeau" <pgranzeau at cox.net> Subject: Re: Several Questions... In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.1040302154423.5646D-100000 at kithrup.com> References: <002601c400a9$0956c110$6501a8c0 at DELL1> <Pine.BSF.3.96.1040302154423.5646D-100000 at kithrup.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed At 15:47 03/02/2004 -0800, David Silberstein wrote: >Here's SKZB on Devera's parentage: > > http://www.sequentialtart.com/archive/jan01/brust.shtml No, that was someone named Deverra, who may or may not be the same person. -- Regards, Pete pgranzeau at cox.net