> @> besides he is paarfi and paarfi is he, so to speak, and we've all > @> become familiar with paarfi's sometimes loose association with putting > @> down events verbatim. > > This argument is roughly equivalent to saying that he ought to start > murdering people. After all, he writes Vlad as well... Given the above definition of "roughly equivalent", I have a better understanding of the rest of the confusion. > But would he really volunteer what looks like information to mislead readers for fun? Yes? Why not? It wouldn't be the first time? GJR