--- Gary Russell <Hereward at rogers.com> wrote: > > @> besides he is paarfi and paarfi is he, so to speak, and we've all > > @> become familiar with paarfi's sometimes loose association with > putting > > @> down events verbatim. > > > > This argument is roughly equivalent to saying that he ought to start > > murdering people. After all, he writes Vlad as well... > > Given the above definition of "roughly equivalent", I have a better > understanding of the rest of the confusion. > > > But would he really volunteer what looks like information to mislead > readers for fun? I wish you'd be a little more careful with the "morns". I wrote the above question but not the "roughly equivalent" comment. I have some sympathy with that comment, though. Steven writes Paarfi, and Paarfi makes up conversations like every historical novelist in history, but that doesn't mean Steven makes up "facts" in interviews. > Yes? Why not? It wouldn't be the first time? Ah! Looks like you know the answer to my question. Has he volunteered what looks like information to mislead readers for fun? When? Jerry Friedman __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search - Find what you’re looking for faster http://search.yahoo.com