On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, David Goldfarb wrote: > While we're on the subject of proofreading, I'll offer up my list of > typoes that I noticed Isn't it "typos"? Anyway, I still think the proofreading (not "proof-reading"? Ok, now I'm seeing "proo freading") of _TEoDM_ was quite good esp. compared to the earlier Paarfiad volumes. For which I thank those resp. for it.