Dragaera

Re-reading

David Silberstein davids at Kithrup.COM
Mon Jun 28 19:42:13 PDT 2004

On Mon, 28 Jun 2004, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:

>Jerry Friedman <jerry_friedman at yahoo.com> writes:
>
>>> Someone's definition of "novel" is "long prose work with something wrong
>>> with it", 
>>
>> That's a good one!  And I take the liberty to agree with the author:
>> the voice is fine.
>
>And doesn't show up in google.  I like it too, but want an
>attribution. 

When an exact match fails, try searching on significant subphrases.
Searching on "prose work" and "something wrong" results in:

     I think of movies the way the poet, essayist and novelist
     Randall Jarrell defined the novel: "A novel is a prose work of
     a certain length that has something wrong with it". 

And also:

     I like Randall Jarrell's brilliant generic critique of a
     novel: "A prose work of some length that has something wrong
     with it".

     I thought about what Jarrell said, and realized it sounded
     like each of the dozen or so review I've written. I only
     review work I like, but feel obligated to point out some
     perceived flaw, omission, or weakness.

     I'm not sure I'll ever write another review again now that
     Jarrell's exposed the formula: "I liked it except for a
     little thing or two here and there".

Searching on "Randall Jarrell", "novel", "wrong" one finds other
variations on the quote:

     Randall Jarrell said a novel is sixty thousand words of
     discursive prose with something wrong with it


     Randall Jarrell once defined a novel as "a long stretch of
     prose with something wrong with it,"    


     WHEN POET AND CRITIC RANDALL JARRELL DEfined the novel as a
     long narrative that tends to have something wrong with it, he
     did not mean printer's errors.


     somebody once told me that Randall Jarrell defined a novel as
     a long piece of narrative prose containing something wrong
     with it.


As you can see, it's a rather annoying set of varying words to
express the concept, but no definitive citation.  I ran into the
same problem trying to track down exactly how and when William
Gibson uttered his famous line about the future being here but
unevenly distributed.  G. K. Chesterton's original wording about
children and belief and monsters is very different from the pithier
words usually assigned to him. 

Anyway, that's the best I can find.  Bah.