I would also agree with the Deed of Paksennarion being much better than the "Gird Prequels"... -------------- Original message from "Durston, Andrew (AGRE)" : -------------- > > Hi all, > > My wife is also a big fan of the combined Paksennarion books. She reads it once > every year or so. She wasn't as fond as the follow-on Gird (was it?) books. > > Ciao, > Andrew > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Matthew Hunter [mailto:matthew at infodancer.org] > Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 4:22 PM > To: dragaera at dragaera.info > Subject: Re: RPG advice? > > I recently started reading Elizabeth Moon (she's going to be MileHiCon > > > GOH), and when I found her first book, was disapointed to see that trilogy > > > was in a basic D&D world. She got more creative since then. > > Well, that's debateable. > > > I think Moon's Paksenarrion trilogy was an excellent > > implementation of a standard "D&D-type" adventure. It's well > > written and enjoyable to read, even though it is clearly set in > > a world very similar to GreyHawk (with the serial numbers filed > > off). It certainly didn't disappoint me. Her later books often > > did, to the extent that I haven't read most of them. > > -- > > Matthew Hunter (matthew at infodancer.org) > Public Key: http://matthew.infodancer.org/public_key.txt > Homepage: http://matthew.infodancer.org/index.jsp > Politics: http://www.triggerfinger.org/weblog/index.jsp > > ****************************************** > The information contained in, or attached to, this e-mail, may contain > confidential information and is intended solely for the use of the individual or > entity to whom they are addressed and may be subject to legal privilege. If you > have received this e-mail in error you should notify the sender immediately by > reply e-mail, delete the message from your system and notify your system > manager. Please do not copy it for any purpose, or disclose its contents to any > other person. The views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely those > of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company. The > recipient should check this e-mail and any attachments for the presence of > viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused, directly or > indirectly, by any virus transmitted in this email. > ******************************************