Jerry Friedman wrote: >john barbato wrote: > > > >>>Chicken in parenthesis. the word.... not kethna is a type of fowl. >>> >>> >>> >>>john barbato od >>> >>> >>>What are you talking about? >>> >>> > >In case anybody still cares, I think the point of this is that >the _usage_ of "kethna" is like that of "chicken" (or "lamb"): >it means both the animal and its meat. However, the _meaning_ >of kethna is something very like a pig. Steve has responded >approvingly to a joke about it not being kosher. (I'm still >waiting for "kethna wings", though.) > > Wait, are you suggesting that kethna *can't* fly?! Jose -- Jose Marquez | There are 10 types of people in jhereg69 at earthlink.net | the world: those who understand http://www.hackwater.com | binary, and those who don't.