--- MedCat7 at aol.com wrote: > I wrote: > In case anybody still cares, I think the point of this is that > >the _usage_ of "kethna" is like that of "chicken" (or "lamb"): > >it means both the animal and its meat. However, the _meaning_ > >of kethna is something very like a pig. Steve has responded > >approvingly to a joke about it not being kosher. (I'm still > >waiting for "kethna wings", though.) > > > > So kethna is an animal with four legs and not a type of fowl (face > twisted in confusion). > -Crystal As far as anybody knows, a kethna is exactly like a pig. Maybe it is a pig. On the other hand, I don't think wings are ruled out. :-) Jerry Friedman __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free! http://my.yahoo.com