On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 05:55:27AM -0700, Howard Brazee wrote:
> He means Lavode. You've never read Philip's theory that Sethra is
> Paarfi? . . .
Two points:
First (and not aimed at Howard in particular) -- I was cracking a joke
that when Philip said 'one Paarfi, accurate and indivisible, of which the
triune aspects are Paarfi the Historian, Paarfi the Romancer, and Sethra'
one of the three aspects he used was ambiguous. Especially after he
was so careful to call out specific incarnations of Paarfis. Jeez. :-)
Second, as for the theory - yes I read it, yes I conveniently ignored
it while cracking a joke, and finally, no, I don't buy it. I *like*
it, but I don't buy it. IMHO, it's unproven.
--
"There's a lot of my personality in my characters. I think that's why
smart-asses are over-represented."
Christopher Moore, in http://www.chrismoore.com/world_domination.htm