Jeff Gibbons wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Howard Brazee" <howard at brazee.net> > To: "Dragaera (E-mail)" <dragaera at dragaera.info> > Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 7:03 PM > Subject: RE: nuclear terminology > > > J > > Oh, I read it extensively. What puzzled me is that you used the same > definitions as I used to show that atomic bombs are nuclear weapons, > but seem to be still denying it. I do not understand your argument > at all. > > Atomic bombs are nuclear weapons. > Hydrogen bombs are nucler weapons. > Fission bombs are nuclear weapons. > Fussion bombs are nuclear weapons. > > These aren't definitions that only physists use, these are > definitions that appear to be universal. > > > Reread this: Done. Had some misspellings I didn't notice.