Dragaera

OT: Symbolism in "Inamorata"

Wed May 11 13:42:37 PDT 2005

Howard Brazee wrote:
> Chris Olson wrote:
>>...
>>It *is* a good book; well written and it keeps the interest going 'till
>>the end.  It's also period (1920s Philadelphia) and touches on a great
>>many issues besides "is this psychic stuff real".
>> 
> 
> However I'm sufficiently a skeptic that that alone is a turn-off.   I 
> like the book _Charles Fort Never Mentioned Wombats_,  by Gene DeWeese 
> and Robert Coulson, where aliens land on in Australia during the World 
> Science Fiction convention.   The punch line in that book is:

Well, it is a piece of fiction, and does answer the question as such.
It's not trying to convince the reader that psychic abilities exist and
one should believe that.  So I wouldn't worry about trying to be
convinced of anything.  (I suppose I should not have said "period", but
instead that it takes place in the '20s and seems to accurately reflect
the time period and area.  Sorry.:)

Speaking of Fort, ever read Fortean Times magazine?  That and Skeptic
magazine are two of my favorites, and I should really get a subscription
one of these days.

:)
Chris