On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 11:50:51 -0400, Scott Schultz <scott at cjhunter.com> wrote: >> While we've never been told explicitly that Keiron's greatsword is or >> isn't a Morganti weapon (prerequisite to being a Great Weapon), I can't >> imagine the Gods would let him wander around the waiting room of >> unreincarnated with a soul-destroying weapon. Even less likely they'd >> let him carry around a Great Weapon, which, let us recall, were made >> for purpose of killing the Gods. > > The Gods are surprisingly tolerant when it comes to property ownership > rights. Verra knows exactly what Spellbreaker is when Vlad shows it to > her. > She could have simply taken it from him. For that matter, if she'd asked > him > to give it to her, he probably would have done so given the proper > convincing. Even when Vlad finally creates Godslayer, Verra reacts with a > certain amount of disgust but she doesn't strike Vlad down or otherwise > try > to take it from him. I don't think that's really enough to evidence infer Verra's general attitude towards personal possessions. See the previous thread about how many GWs "just happen" to have some relation to Verra. If she is actively trying to tie GWs to herself then collecting Spellbreaker from Vlad would have been counter-productive. Not to mention possibly needlessly annoying one of her more useful supporters. -- Everything works in Theory. I need to learn how to program in Theory.