Brian Vanskyock wrote: >**-----Original Message----- >**From: dragaera-bounces at dragaera.info >**[mailto:dragaera-bounces at dragaera.info] On >**Behalf Of Jon Lincicum >**Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 8:12 PM >**To: Scott Schultz >**Cc: 'Dragaera List' >**Subject: Re: How will House Phoenix arise from >**the ashes? >** >**Scott Schultz wrote: >** >**>Actually, it's the lack of any textev stating >**that Zerika I was a Reborn >**>Phoenix. From what we've been told she was sent >**visions, which she heeded >**>and by doing so she created the foundation of >**what eventually became the >**>Empire. >**> >**> >**A Lack of evidence to the contrary does not >**positive evidence make. I >**forget which logical fallacy this is, exactly, >**but it has a fancy Latin >**name. >** >argumentum ad ignorantiam (?) > > >[Brian Vanskyock] > > > Yes. That's the one. Thanks. See its entry in the list of logical fallacies at http://www.infidels.org/news/atheism/logic.html#ignorantiam Majikjon