Chris Turkel <zizban at adelphia.net> writes: > I have proposed spoiler rules already, for everyone to consider. I'll > repeat them in brief: > > 1) The readalong list is, by definition, a spoiler. Ask me if you > don't know what I mean. I think that's a good rule. We can expand it a bit in the official copy to give people less excuse for missing the point. > 2) Put the book or chapter(s) we are reading the header only. Example: > "Re;Teckla" or "Re:Teckla Chapter Five". No need to be put spoiler > warnings on headers or in the email. The use of "only" in the first sentence confuses me. Do you mean that the subject header should consist *only* of the name of the book and chapters? That one should not attempt to separate threads by giving them distinct subjects? Or are you only saying *not* to put spoiler notices there? > 3) Don't put something like "Re:Teckla CAWTI IS SETHRA" That is, don't put major spoilers in the subject headers? (Even if untrue :-) ). I think that's a good rule. -- David Dyer-Bennet, dd-b at dd-b.net / New TMDA anti-spam in test John Dyer-Bennet 1915-2002 Memorial Site http://john.dyer-bennet.net Book log: http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/Ouroboros/booknotes/ New Dragaera mailing lists, see http://dragaera.info