On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Baralier wrote:
>
>No one so far on this list has shown any sign that the discussion has
>in any way altered their concept / belief / perception / understanding
>/ faith / idea / adherence to whether or not anything supernatural
>(much less gods singular or plural) even exists.
>
"You can not reason a man out of a position he did not reach
through reason." (couldn't track down a source for that)
But sometimes it's worthwhile to go through the exercise. [1]
Of course, only agnosticism is actually *reasonable*.
[1] Exercise, n: Waving of hands, increase in pulse rate, raising
of voice. Allegedly good for the body and soul.