I was recently lent, and have read, a book by Joseph Gangemi titled _Inamorata_. It's about a Harvard Psych student who's sent off to test the validity of psychic mediums, and one in particular. My friend wanted me to read it because she got to the end and was stumped as to what the author might be implying. As she put it: "I feel as though I can't see the forest for the trees". I had a lengthy discussion with her after I'd finished it, and feel I agree with her. We're both annoyed that we may have missed something the author was hinting at, or clues he dropped, or *something*. It *is* a good book; well written and it keeps the interest going 'till the end. It's also period (1920s Philadelphia) and touches on a great many issues besides "is this psychic stuff real". My friend and I would love to get more feedback from other people on this book to see if we're really missing some symbolism or clue that would not necessarily answer all the unanswered questions, but at least ensure we don't feel as though we missed something major along the way. As this list boasts some of the smartest people I know, with enough knowledge of literature to fill Red Dwarf, I figured it wouldn't hurt to send out a challenge (or suggestion, at least). If anyone is interested in reading this book (I believe it's out in paperback), and getting in touch, we'd both love to have different viewpoints. And, okay, to keep this at least a little on-topic: Steve kicks much and takes many! :) Chris