On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Jon Lincicum wrote: > Philip Hart wrote: > > > >Or Paresh is lying like shag wall-to-wall. > > > > > We pretty much know Paresh is lying (or mis-remembering, anyway) at > least some portions of his story, since his version is different from > Paarfi's In May '04 I was involved in an energetic argument on the list with another poster (John Klein?) who was defending the accurate-Paresh thesis against my absolutist accurate-Paarfi position. I think there were some good points on both sides, though I still hold my view. (I see there was another such argument in August '03 - I think me vs everybody.)