Multiple emporers in a reign, revisited

Joshua Kronengold mneme at io.com
Mon Mar 13 11:05:29 PST 2006

Philip Hart writes:
>Did this not come up at the time?  Anyway, it's good evidence on the
>multi-emperor side,


>info than strictly necessary.  And I still don't see any clear mechanism
>for the emperor dying and his House remaining in power.

This seems to be the -only- possible result should an Emperor die
before the minimum time expires, and, in fact, the only possible way
for a House to reign for the maximum term.

But then, we've gone over this a number of times without many people
being convinced.

       Joshua Kronengold (mneme@(io.com, labcats.org)) |\      _,,,--,,_  ,)
--^--  "Remember the Doom Team code!" says Tom.       /,`.-'`'   -,  ;-;;'
 /\\  	"You don't have to die just because some      |,4-  ) )-,_ ) /\     
/-\\\  	people think your existence is evil!"	     '---''(_/--' (_/-'