On 2:04 PM Jon_Lincicum at stream.com wrote: > While I'll agree that it's possible that Dragaera is "not natural" or has > been terraformed, I'd say we don't have enough to go on to say that > it is "likely". I'd be interested in hearing your reasoning for this. One thing - we see beings who can in many ways be defined as creators. Another thing, some of the characteristics of the planet match closely to some of our mythos. > While we have a number of solutions we can "imagine" for terraforming > worlds, they all involve tremendous expenditures of energy and/or > time that are, at present, beyond our technological abilities. The powerful technology that we see there isn't our technology. We also see some material which may be "left-over" from the world-building process. Powerful, dangerous material that seems to have a tremendous energy content. The world as we see it and the amorphia don't seem to be things that could have co-existed for millions of years without some kind of control over things.